Editorial standards
Inference Wire exists to help professionals understand AI clearly and act on it with confidence. That only works if what we publish is accurate, well sourced, and honest about what is known and what is not. These are the standards we hold ourselves to.
Accuracy and sourcing
We ground our reporting in primary sources: company announcements, official filings, product documentation, research papers, and named reporting. When we describe a development we link to the source so you can check it yourself.
We prioritize primary evidence over second-hand accounts. Where a claim is contested or a number is an estimate, we say so rather than presenting it as settled.
Editorial responsibility
Abdul Rehman Asghar, Senior AI Consultant and Editor, is responsible for the editorial standards of everything Inference Wire publishes.
Questions about our coverage can be sent to editor@mail.inferencewire.com.
Corrections
When we get something wrong we fix it and say so. Our corrections policy explains how to report an error and how we handle it.
Independence
Our coverage is not for sale. We do not accept payment to feature, promote, or soften coverage of any company, product, or person.
What we cover, and how we describe it, is an editorial decision alone.
Clarity
We write in plain language. We explain what a development is and why it matters, and we avoid hype in both directions. A reader should finish an item knowing what happened and what it means for their work.